…disregard the ETE question. I see that you do still strongly recommend. Any insight on GEL? Thanks.

As an owner of MLPL, this past week has been especially painful. That buy up to price I believe is mid $50’s. Pie in the sky if you ask me.

Thanks, Ed. Just shared my view on the recent market action here http://www.investingdaily.com/mlp-profits/stock-talk/#comment-63614 and on the buy limits here http://www.investingdaily.com/mlp-profits/stock-talk/#comment-63588 earlier today, I don’t subscribe to the notion that a price target says much about the value of the stock today, or even that you need a price target to appreciate the value. If I move all the buy limits relevantly 15% above the current price and the long overdue rally hits them in two months, would that imply that MLPs are no longer buys? Or would I just raise the limits 15% above the new price again? And what would be the point? We provide plenty of nuance and risk discussion in our recommendations, have three portfolios explicitly organized by degree of perceived risk and also a ranked Best Buys list. So I just dont believe that a buy limit, however set, provides much if any elucidation above and beyond all of that. I try to set the buy limits honestly, and while it’s never good to see a big discrepancy as during the current market rout, I don’t believe moving limits up and down as market prices change is the value-added service we’re providing. We’ve been proactive in urging subscribers to take profits near prior highs and in steering them clear of at least some of the worst disasters (upstream MLPs, Eagle Rock, Boardwalk, etc.). In my mind a well timed Sell or Sell Half is worth more than an unlimited number after-the-fact target adjustments. But happy to continue this conversation.